Home › Compare › Fundamentals Hub

Aegwah vs Fundamentals Hub: earnings-event depth vs statement breadth

Fundamentals Hub offers broad financial statement coverage across roughly 8,000 companies with a free tier. Aegwah is narrower — S&P 500/400 only — but bundles earnings-event enrichments that a general fundamentals API typically does not provide.

Where Aegwah is stronger

• Earnings-event bundle: as-filed GAAP EPS + announcement timing (BMO/AMC) + Form 4 open-market P/S + PIT balance facts in one product.
• Pro tier adds insider buying clusters (3+ buys in 7 days) and conviction scores (0–100) — field descriptions, not trade recommendations.
• Published per-ticker earnings quality scores (0–100); Form 4, guidance, and balance have separate coverage tabs (not that score).
• Every EDGAR-sourced record links to the exact SEC accession number for audit.
• S&P depth: 16+ years of quarterly GAAP EPS with restatement and split-adjustment transparency.

Where Fundamentals Hub is stronger

• Much broader universe (~8,000 companies vs ~500 S&P names).
• Broader statement line items and free-tier coverage across thousands of names beyond our S&P focus.
• Free tier available for basic access.
• Good fit if you need wide coverage across small and mid-cap names.

Bottom line

Choose Fundamentals Hub for broad statement coverage across thousands of companies on a free or low-cost tier. Choose Aegwah if your work centers on S&P earnings events — auditable GAAP EPS, PIT balance, BMO/AMC timing, Form 4 data, published earnings quality scores, and separate module coverage in one maintained dataset.

Pricing and features for Fundamentals Hub change over time — always check their current site for the latest. This page reflects Aegwah's honest read of the trade-offs, not a knock on a good product.